JAMES PRESSLEY, Petitioner,
v.
AMY MILLER, Respondent.
CASE NO. CV 13-1687-RGK (PJW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DATED: February 13, 2014
JAMES PRESSLEY, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Respondent.
CASE NO. CV 13-1687-RGK (PJW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DATED: February 13, 2014
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITYPursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C.
Page 2
§ 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 336 (2003).
__________________________ R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Please, select a date range