Your document has been successfully saved!

Search through millions of court cases, regulations, statutes and more...

Search for
Boolean Connector Use Result
AND Sleep AND Fall Records with both “Slip” and “Fall”
OR Lee OR Grant Records with either “Lee” or “Grant”
NOT Transaction NOT Fee Records that contain “Transaction” but exclude “Fee”
( ) (Tree OR Shrub) AND Fall Records containing “Tree” or “Shrub”, and the word “Fall”
" " "Capital Punishment" Records containing the exact phrase “Capital Punishment”
* Affirm* Records containing variations of the root word (such as “Affirmed”, “Affirming”, “Affirmation”, and etc…)
? Connect?r Records that contain single letter variations (such as “Connector” and “Connecter”)
Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
Decision Date: 6/5/2015

STATES

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            FEDERAL

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Stanley v. Young Stanley v. Young (E. D. Tex., 2015)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        RAYMOND STANLEY
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        v.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        WARDEN SCOTT YOUNG

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        CIVIL ACTION NO. 5: 15cv43

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        June 5, 2015

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        RAYMOND STANLEY v. WARDEN SCOTT YOUNG

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        CIVIL ACTION NO. 5: 15cv43

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        June 5, 2015

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Raymond Stanley, proceeding pro se filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a motion (doc. no. 3) seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Discussion

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Petitioner has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application states that on the date it was prepared, petitioner had a balance of $132. 67 in his inmate trust account.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Since 1892, Congress has permitted indigent persons to bring lawsuits in federal courts without prepayment of filing fees. Act of July 20, 1892, ch. 209. 27 Stat. 252 (codified, as amended, at 28 U.S.C. § 1915). The applicable statute is intended to provide access to the federal courts for litigants who lack the financial resources to pay any part of the statutory filing costs. However, a district court may order users of the courts to pay the filing fees when they are financially able to do so. See Williams v. Estelle 681 F.2d 946 (5th Cir. 1982).

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Based on the available balance in petitioner's inmate trust account, it is clear he has sufficient assets to pay the $5 filing fee applicable to his petition. Accordingly, petitioner will be

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Page 2

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directed to pay the $5 filing fee.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ORDER

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                For the reasons set forth above, petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Petitioner shall pay the $5 filing fee within 30 days of the date set forth below.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                SIGNED this 5th day of June 2015.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                /s/_________        CAROLINE M. CRAVEN        UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Cited By
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Cites
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Williams v. Estelle, 681 F.2d 946 (5th Cir., 1982)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Decision Date: 1982-07-02 Citations: 5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Negative Treatment
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Notes

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Please, select a date range